Intra-family lending
The median first-time buyer has aged more than a decade since the 1980s, and family money has quietly become a normal part of the down payment rather than an exception.
In the 1980s, the typical American buying a first home was in their late twenties. In the National Association of Realtors' 2025 profile, that buyer is 40 years old — the oldest on record. First-time buyers also fell to just 21% of the market, another record, in a survey that has run annually since 1981.
Those two numbers describe the same problem from different angles: entry into ownership is taking longer, and fewer people are managing it at all.
The National Association of Home Builders put the median price of both new and existing homes at roughly $403,000 to $404,000 in the first quarter of 2026. Against a national median income of about $106,800, that means a family earning the median needed roughly 32% of its income to carry the mortgage on a median-priced new home. For families earning half the median, the same house consumes about 65% of income.
The down payment is the harder wall. Median down payments for first-time buyers have climbed to around 10%, the highest level since 1989. On a $400,000 home that is $40,000 in cash, assembled by someone who is also paying rent at current market rates.
This is where the Bank of Mom & Dad enters, and it is no longer a footnote. Among 2025's first-time buyers, 22% used a gift or a loan from relatives or friends to reach the down payment. Among the youngest cohort of owners the share is dramatically higher; most Gen Z homeowners report having received some family help.
Read that alongside the wealth data and it stops looking like generosity and starts looking structural. Baby Boomers hold about 51% of US household wealth and Gen X another 26%. The capital exists inside the same families that contain the priced-out buyers. It is simply sitting on the wrong side of a thirty-year age gap.
When family money does move, it usually moves informally. A transfer happens, everyone privately holds a slightly different understanding of what it was, and nobody writes anything down.
That creates three specific problems:
None of this is an argument for families to help less. It is an argument for helping on the record. A documented intra-family loan at an AFR-compliant rate keeps the arrangement clean with the IRS, gives the mortgage lender a clear answer, preserves the lender's balance sheet instead of spending it, and leaves a balance everyone can look up rather than argue about.
It also tends to be cheaper for the borrower than any retail alternative, and the interest stays inside the family rather than leaking to an institution.
The first-time buyer being 40 is not a story about one generation's finances. It is a story about capital sitting one generation away from where it is needed, and about how little infrastructure exists to move it deliberately.
See how Pari structures family lending.